23.10.2024
Nature Restoration Law (NRL)
For Prelims: About Nature Restoration Law (NRL), Need for Restoration Law in India, Benefits of restoration |
Why in the news?
The Nature Restoration Law (NRL), which was enacted by the European Union (EU), is an inspiring model from which India can draw points to tackle its growing environmental crises.
About Nature Restoration Law (NRL):
○Under the NRL, Member States will have to restore at least 20% of the EU’s land and sea by 2030, including terrestrial, coastal, and freshwater, forest, agricultural, and urban areas.
○By 2050, the measures should extend to all ecosystems "requiring restoration".
○The EU NRL also targets an obligation to improve urban green spaces, contribute to free-flowing rivers by removing artificial barriers, increase pollinator populations, and contribute to the target of 3 billion additional trees throughout the EU.
○Member States must adopt "restoration plans" detailing how they intend to achieve these targets and ensure that the restored areas do not significantly deteriorate.
○While drafting these Nature Restoration Plans, Member States also need to consider socio-economic impacts and benefits and estimate the financial needs for its implementation.
Need for Restoration Law in India
Benefits of restoration
○In India, restoring degraded lands would enhance agricultural productivity, improve water security, and create millions of jobs, particularly in rural areas.
Source: The Hindu
Consider the following statements regarding Nature Restoration Law (NRL), recently seen in the news:
Statement-I: It is a European Union (EU) law to tackle the triple crises of climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental degradation.
Statement-II:It sets binding targets on member states to destroy degraded ecosystems.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
A.Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.
B.Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I.
C.Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect.
D.Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct.
Answer C